(For a quick review of our cast of characters at the 19th hole, see The Regulars post)
Tucker: Hey, 3-jack, nice lag on 18, 1 up for the bad guys. First round’s on me. Couple more putts like that and we’ll have either get you a new nickname … or just start using it for your drink order. Bartender, we’ll take 3 jack and cokes, 1 Sam Adams, 1 Corona with a lime, and 1 Guinness.
Rick: Good to finally get over on you punks – you had us the last 3 in a row. We were about ready to suggest new teams if you’d won today.
Walt: Did you boys check out Sorenstam’s performance at the ADT? Impressive stuff – pulling away from one of the best fields of the year and defending her win at the season-ending tourney. No question about it – she had the best season this year of any golfer on any tour. Hey Tucker – did you get a bowl of soup with that shirt? Geez, that thing’s bright enough to stop a truck, or at least an SUV.
Tucker: Yeah, coming from the prince of fashion, I’ll just let that go. Annika had a nice year, but let’s not forget that guy named Tiger over on the PGA tour. Last I checked, Annika’s still playing from the front tees AND Tiger doesn’t play in any of her events, so it’s hard to count them as official. Hey Bomber, pass over some of those mixed nuts – just because you won on the course doesn’t mean you get all the snacks.
Billy: No problem head case, what else would I call you after forgetting Michelle Wie wasn’t even at this tournament – you’d think they’d find a way to get her in this one. If they can change the rules for majors to let her in, what’s the matter with just letting her in this one? Crikey – you American blokes are so uptight with the rules.
Walt: Oh, now there you go again Mr. Aussie Rules – hey, who was watching me like a hawk when I had to take a drop for that unplayable on 13. You were breathing down my neck so hard I thought my wife was somewhere on the course. As for those allegedly tough rules, it’s tough to be a top 30 money winner when you’re still an amateur and not collecting prize money – Michelle will have her shot next year now that she’s turned pro. I won’t even comment on that silly front tee snipe. I do hear that an argument is being made that Tiger is the golfer of the year for 2005? OK, let’s check some of the stats.
Rick: Yikes – let me get a drink first, they said no math – particularly after I tried to add up the scores on 13, with or without that unplayable. Second, someone breathing hard on you should remind you of your kids after they climb in bed with you – I know your wife, and now that she’s gotten the children, your usefulness in bed is strictly as a pillow for the kids to sleep on.
Billy: You’re telling me – very tough par-6 that 13th hole. I’m not sure what all the fuss is about player of the year – Annika and Tiger were both at the Skins Game and Fred Funk won it wearing a skirt, so he’s your guy for this year.
Rick: Yeah, there you go, we’ll let an 18-hole 2-day 4-person tournament determine player of the year. Much as ABC would love to see it, let’s not ignore the rest of the tournaments for the year.
Walt: Settle down boys – I’ve got this cool little new laptop with wireless access, all the math’s done for us. As always, we’ll look at a couple of key stats – number of wins and quality of wins always seem to be a good place to start. First, let’s look at the number of wins – Tiger had 6 wins, and Annika had 10 wins this season. Hmm, that looks like advantage Annika.
Tucker: Yeah, but let’s check the starts, Tiger probably played in way fewer events than Annika.
Walt: Bzzzt, thanks for playing, good guess but no soup for you. That argument may work with Vijay and the money title, but Tiger actually played in 21 events and Annika played in 20. For you math-challenged sports fans that means Annika played in one fewer events. So one less start and four more wins – this may turn into two for Annika with you supporting Tiger’s cause. Any other arguments you want to throw out there?
Tucker: Hmm, think I’ll pass. Let’s switch gears then to the quality of wins. First, let’s look at the majors. Tiger won two this year, including Augusta and the British, and should’ve won the other two.
Walt: Coulda, shoulda, woulda, that’s quality argument material, my friend, but it just doesn’t hold up again. Annika won the first two majors of the year and had a tie for 5th and tie for 23rd in the other two. So they won the same number of majors.
Tucker: Yeah, but Tiger won at Augusta with that awesome chip-in at 16 to force the playoff, then made that clutch birdie putt on 18 to beat DiMarco. Then Michael Campbell stole the US Open at Pinehurst before Tiger lapped the field at St. Andrews. Finally Phil stole the PGA from him with that great up-and-down at 18.
Walt: You conveniently forget about Tiger’s bogey-bogey finish in regulation and DiMarco’s narrow misses on chip-in attempts at 18 in regulation and the playoff at the Masters. Not sure how Michael stole anything at the US Open – he won by two even with a bogey on 18, it was Tiger’s bogeys on 16 and 17 that left the door wide open. And tell me again how Phil stole anything from Tiger at the PGA when Elkington and Bjorn finished ahead of him as well. Even if Phil doesn’t get up and down, Tiger’s not winning that tournament, unless we start giving out trophies for T-4th? Meanwhile, let’s talk about quality wins and performances. Tiger missed 2 cuts this year and finished outside the top 25 four times. Annika did not miss any cuts and her lowest finish was T-23rd. She only finished outside the top 10 five times – Tiger had eight of those.
Billy: You boys done with this one, yet, I’d like to get something to eat. Hi Suzy, can I get a turkey club with no mayo?
Rick: Fish and chips here.
Walt: Chicken ceasar, dressing on the side, thanks.
Tucker: Bacon cheeseburger with fries please.
Walt: And in fact, I’m not done with this one yet. Maybe Tiger should win more majors like Annika – the Kraft by 8 strokes and the LPGA Championship by 3. It’s hard for anyone to “steal” anything from you when you’ve built that big a lead.
Tucker: Yeah, well Tiger used to win them by that much, but then the other guys finally got tired of getting kicked around like your dog after a 9er game and started bringing the A game … at least once in a while.
Walt: Thanks for staying on point. Where were we? OK, so Annika’s got more wins in fewer tournaments – one for me. And Annika’s got higher quality finishes and wins, along with no missed cuts – two for me. You want to give up now or keep on trying – these other guys may have somewhere else they’ve got to be?
Rick: No way, I haven’t even eaten yet.
Billy: Me either – plus this is getting mildly entertaining, although you’re putting up about as much defense as Kobe plays these days. He hasn’t met a shot he doesn’t like, and he’s making just about 2 out of every 5. Nice stats if you’re playing shortstop, not so great if you’re a 2-guard. Man I’d trade him for Steve Nash straight up.
Walt: Right, like the Suns would touch that trade – you’d have to throw in Lamar and some cash to make that even close to working.
Rick: Would you two stop bickering?
Tucker: This isn’t bickering, this is aspirational to bickering – so far I’m just getting hammered like my poor Pats’ D this year. It’s OK though, Brady’s young – we’ll be back. Last argument – let’s look at the stats for the year. Tiger’s gotta have her on that one.
Walt: Ooooh, didn’t think you’d go there, I actually researched that last night in anticipation of our little, ahem, discussion. This one converts it from a runaway to me opening up a big old can of whup ass on you for a couple of weeks. Bad enough to suggest Tiger had a better year – wins and quality wins were convincing, but this is overwhelming. Let’s start with driving – Tiger’s new equipment helped him it longer alright, 2nd in overall distance, but it also helped him it a bit more crooked, 188th in fairways hit and 83rd in total driving. Ouch, sounds like T’s going to get his license revoked – he may need to go to driver’s training, or whatever Hank Haney calls those lessons. Oh, and Annika, you ask, and thank you so much for asking – 4th in distance and 12th in fairways hit – no 3-point turns required here. Any other stats you want to check up on?
Tucker: How about greens in regulation?
Walt: Better, but not good enough. 70% for Tiger – 6th on tour – respectable but not nearly as good as Annika’s 77%, which of course was 1st on tour. Any others?
Billy: Whoa, whoa, this is my throwing in the white towel. Tucker – you are getting worked like Duke against the Sisters of the Poor, or whoever those non-conference hoops opponents they whoop up on are – it’s over, TKO and we’re outta here.
Walt: Hang on, let’s recap. Annika – more wins in fewer events, more quality wins, no missed cuts, and better stats. Tell me again why anyone would vote for Tiger.
Rick: Well, if you look at 2005 compared to 2004, he had a much better year.
Walt: Ah, the last refuge of the desperate, let’s change the rules. We’re not talking about Comeback Player of the Year, we’re talking about Player of the Year. All in favor of Annika – say aye. Ah, it’s unanimous – that’s more like it. Now pass me the ketchup, I’m taking some of Tucker’s fries after that weak effort …