Lies, damn lies, and (PGA Tour Golf) statistics

All about professional golf, focusing on the media's coverage of PGA Tour events.

Recent Posts

  • What's going on in professional golf?
  • Phil v Tiger - take the field (give the points)
  • The fifth major ... it's not the Players, it's ... Arnie's place!
  • Mandatory prime time pairings were just the start for ESPN …
  • ESPN – the once and future king-maker or hoisted on their own petard?
  • Tim Finchem – from Russian Roulette to master of his own domain in one contract!
  • Michelle Wie – contents under pressure – do not open until 2008!
  • If you care about the facts, start here!
  • Golfer of the year for 2005 is ...
  • Our cast of characters (aka The Regulars)

Cool golf blogs

  • One Day One Shot (Photo blog)
  • Eat Golf
  • Grouchy Golf Blog
  • TravelGolf.com
  • 19th Hole Comedy (TM)
  • Perform Better Golf
  • Golf Blogger: Everything Golf
  • The Sand Trap.com
  • Hooked On Golf
  • Major Championships

Blogosphere

What's going on in professional golf?

Hi – welcome, and thanks for visiting! This blog is intended to be a humorous look at the PGA and the golf media. There are some mock interviews and some 19th-hole discussions on hot topics with our set of regulars (click here to see profiles of ”the regulars”)  If you like what you see, tell your friends! If not, keep it to yourself and forget you visited …

2006 news and views

  • Phil v Tiger - take the field (April 17, 2006)
  • The “fifth major” is not the Players Championship, it’s Bay Hill! (March 22, 2006)

What's up with the new PGA TV contract (and golf media)?

  • Mandatory prime time pairings were just the start for ESPN ... (February 23, 2006)
  • Tim Finchem - from Russian Roulette to Master of his domain (February 16, 2006)
  • ESPN – the once and future king-maker or hoisted on their own petard? (February 19, 2006)
  • Michelle Wie may not be quite ready for prime time (January 16, 2006)
  • The Golfer of the Year for 2005 is … Annika! (December 6, 2005)

So many tournaments ... so little time to cover them

  • Augusta – an experience unlike any other

    • ESPN might focus on Tiger a bit much – you decide (April 9, 2005)
    • Conspiracy theorists – check out this Nike grassy knoll! (April 1, 2005)
    • Why was Phil Mickelson the favorite for the 2005 Masters?  Doh - missed it  by 3 majors! (March 2, 2005)
  • Accenture Match Play – most exciting tournament in the world ... until Tiger loses (February 27, 2005)
  • Mercedes Championship – ah, media coverage that makes us wish Tirico had an AFC Playoff game to attend (January 19, 2005)
  • 2004 USOpen winner will be … Ernie Els ... Whoops! Can I get a mulligan? Can Ernie get a mulligan? (June 10, 2004)
  • 2004 Memorial recap – and why Shaun Micheel should not be forgotten (June 10, 2004)

Why is everyone complaining about the equipment?

  • Here’s some equipment that doesn’t make the ball go farther! (November 18, 2005)
  • And some “As seen on TV” equipment – more useful than you think! (November 6, 2005)

Other topics

  • The leader of US team events is … Chris DiMarco?  Yep, after the President’s Cup, that is the ONLY right answer! (October 3, 2005)
  • So you want the facts? Here’s a good place to start!

April 17, 2006 in Sports | Permalink | Comments (1)

Phil v Tiger - take the field (give the points)

(Another 19-hole discussion among  ”the regulars”)

Walt: So old 2-driver Lefty gets it done with an amazing performance at Augusta.  That’s 3 out of 9 boys, one more than Shark, Curtis Strange, and Long John.  He’s really starting to put the pedal down now.  That back 9 was awesome – he almost made it look boring, it was so routine – sadly it reminded me a lot of Tiger in 2002, steadying the ship as everyone else threw up all over themselves. 

Tucker: Yeah, well, if Tiger had actually brought his real putter with him, maybe Phil wouldn’t have just had a cake walk to the finish line on Sunday.

Walt: Oh, so that wasn’t his real putter.

Tucker: No way, some imposter threw it in his bag when he wasn’t looking.  They must’ve distracted Tiger and Steve with a really cute girl, then swapped it out.  No way he putts like that on Sunday at a major with his real putter.  I’m guessing they either found some really hot Augusta local and had her parade by the putting green a few times, or they found some of those pesky Internet photos of Elin that Tiger’s not too happy about and started handing them out to the other players.

Walt: And somehow Tiger, with all of the alleged superpowers you’ve given him, wasn’t able to deduce that this putter wasn’t his?  And I think I saw some of those photos – but who knows, maybe she actually wears that little French maid outfit out to the course.  That would get most of us pretty fired up.

Tucker: Fired up – you’d need to move back your starting time by about 8 minutes.  It does seem amazing that Tiger wouldn’t recognize such a fundamental problem like having his equipment misplaced.  Hey, what can I say, he must’ve had a really good night with Elin on Saturday – like you’d even care if you were using the right putter after some of that.  All of the blood goes to the wrong place, and it takes a while for the equipment to work properly. 

Billy:  I just want Elin to check my equipment, if you know what I’m saying?

Walt: Oh, I do, and this is potentially a family and friends blog, so let’s move on.  Now back to the Masters … I’m not buying the whole Tigger putter conspiracy theory – I think he had the right putter, he just couldn’t figure out how to use it for a few holes.  And let’s be clear, that’s not just Tiger – everyone has a few troubles on the Augusta greens, particularly on the downhill putts.  Tiger left a few of his putts above the hole like the one on 13, and you know you can’t get anything close to aggressive when you do that.  Bottom line is Phil kept applying pressure to the entire field because while he knew they were ahead making birdies, they knew he was behind them with the same holes to play, and not backing up much.  This Phil’s a different guy than the guy we knew up until 2003 – “Phil the Thrill” is now “Phil the accountant” – suddenly Mr. Excitement has turned into Mr. Closer. 

Tucker: Oh, stop acting like Phil’s the man.  If Tiger putts anywhere close to normal, they’re probably in a playoff.  We’ll get the old Phil back – he must’ve shoved him in an equipment shed somewhere on the Augusta grounds – we’ll find him, don’t you worry.  Phil the Accountant – sheesh, yeah, maybe for Enron – Phil’s quite capable of putting up the big #, he just figured out a way to avoid it for one day. 

Walt: Ahem, yes, and that day would be Sunday at Augusta.  I think that old Phil might be dead and buried 6 feet under.  He may reappear infrequently, but this was a convincing win on a tough track.  Fear not, though, undoubtedly the press will realize that by around June 10 they need to make Tiger the odds on favorite.

Tucker: Why’s that?

Walt: Well, at the very least NBC is going to realize it, because they don’t want to get “Kostised” 

Tucker: Ouch – I think that happened to me once during fraternity hazing, took two weeks and a lot of antibiotics but it cleared up.

Walt: Nice – I’m not even going to guess what you think I said – you remember Tiger’s treatment of Kostis, won’t even let the lead CBS swing analyst get an interview in after his rounds these days because he’s so cranky that anyone would dare analyze the boy king’s swing and find fault.  Hey, Tiger, you want to shut Kostis up, try bringing it in a relevant tournament since the calendar hit 2006.  All we keep hearing about is how great Tiger’s hitting it, and then we see T20 at Arnie’s and T22 at the Players.  Tiger’s hitting it great – blah blah blah.  First, like Tiger’s going to ever see he’s not hitting it great.  Second, if he’s hitting it great, what’s Phil doing?

Tucker: What do you mean – Tiger’s hitting it straighter and longer than ever, his irons are all over the flag, and he’s putting – well, OK, 2 out of 3 aren’t bad.

Walt: Hmm, so let’s check out a couple of stats to, ahem, support your position.

Tucker: Uh oh, he’s got that pesky little cough again – this doesn’t look good.

Walt: Oh, it won’t be too painful – we’ll make this quick.  For 2006 Phil’s 12th in total driving and Tiger’s 41st, Phil’s hitting 73% of GIRs while Tiger’s at 71%, Phil’s 2nd in putting while Tiger’s 127th – yikes if this were just about putting Tiger wouldn’t have his card!  But it’s not just the putter – Phil’s pounding him in GIR and driving as well, so like I said if Tiger’s playing great what the heck is Phil doing??  Now let’s get back to the topic – the reason why NBC has to make Tiger the prohibitive favorite is because they actually want Mark Rolfing to get an interview with Tiger after his round. 

Tucker: Wait a minute, you’re saying that NBC would actually adjust pre-tourney coverage Tiger’s direction just to get an interview.  That’s kind of dicey – sort of like a CBS NCAA tourney commentator who has to interview all the big conference coaches regularly suggesting that the mid-major teams shouldn’t even get into the tournament and don’t deserve their spots.

Walt: But enough about Billy Packer!  I’m absolutely saying that – no way NBC wants to do without interviews.  Plus, this way NBC can change the rules a bit and diversify the portfolio.

Tucker:  What do you mean – we’re not going to have Tim Finchem buying pork belly futures anytime soon are we?

Walt: No, fear not my neophyte investor friend – my point was that they can reduce the risk of a lost weekend tremendously with one small change.

Tucker: What’s that?  And you call me neophyte one more time and I’ll take a 9-iron to your inner thigh – or at least I think that’s where that neophyte I met at a bar a while back left me in an injured state for about a week.

Walt: Your literary genius, that would be nympho – and you probably just crossed the over-sharing line but thanks for the info.  All the press needs to do is go from “Tiger v the field” to “Tiger and Phil v the field”  Both are equally ridiculous but at least with the second they get two players to cheer for – beats the heck out of the current high-risk portfolio of “Tiger or bust”

Tucker: So I’ll take either – Tiger and/or Phil – fine.  Look at Augusta – they routinely finish top 10 and are in the last 5 groups getting lots of TV time.  That works for CBS, why can’t it work for NBC?

Walt: You want a good reason?

Tucker:  Geez, is there an echo in here?

Walt:  I’ll give you 54 of them, starting with Camillo Villegas, J.B. Holmes, and Bubba Watson.  Say what you want about the Masters, but it’s the weakest field of the majors – 90 competitors, including all the past champions like Charlie Coody.  Granted Charlie found a 74 on Friday, but let’s be serious his chances of winning are about as good as mine.  None of the three I just mentioned got into the tournament, even though Holmes had that dominating win at the FBR, Camillo has 3 top 5s and Bubba Watson has had a great spring including a 4th at Sony and a 3rd in Tucson.  But the Masters didn’t feel they needed to invite them – punks. 

Rick: They are not punks – they hit it a ton and they’ve got some short game.  These kids can play.

Walt: Not the players – the punks are the Masters committee members who dole out special invites and forgot to include any of the three.  Apparently they were too busy trying to figure out how to get Michelle Wie a spot – they forgot to invite all the quality young talent around the PGA these days.  Well one of the main reasons we get such a quality leaderboard at Augusta is because there are 54 less guys for the names guys to have to pass before they start getting mentioned by the announcers.

Rick: So what are you saying?

Walt: I’m saying if you give me a choice of Tiger and Phil or the field, it’s the easiest money I’ve ever spent since I gave up my lunch money for those Batman Fritos chips. 

Rick: Yeah, I’ll bet they match your Grr-animals Batman outfit.  And where’s your easy money?

Walt: Easy money is on the field – not even a question.  144 guys v 90 – I’ll take the field every time.  And you know what you should bring if you want to bet Tiger and Phil?

Rick: What’s that?

Walt: Your wallet and an ATM card, because you will need both.  The media gets all excited about this big “Phil and Tiger” rivalry but the least likely result is that they play in the same group on Sunday.  The more likely result is that they will play the weekend but have to be content with 142 other players trying to get in the way of them lifting a trophy.

April 17, 2006 in Sports | Permalink | Comments (5)

The fifth major ... it's not the Players, it's ... Arnie's place!

Welcome - the following is one of many 19th hole discussion between our regular visitors.  Click here for a profile of the crew.

Walt: Ah, the Players Championship – one of the toughest fields on one of the toughest tracks all year, and this year’s event is wide open.

Tucker: I was on Yahoo! sports the other day – the rallying crew is in mid-season form for the Players to be the 5th major. Doug Ferguson had a piece on it – although in the end he went with Jeff Sluman for breakfast.

Billy: No way Ferguson eats with Sluman – Slu’s a Denny’s guy, Ferguson strikes me as IHOP special all the way.

Tucker: They didn’t actually eat breakfast, bonehead – he went with Slu’s reasoning on why the Players can’t be a 5th major. Sluman boiled it down with that classic quote, "When you go Denny's and order the Grand Slam breakfast, they don't give you five things, do they? They give you four."

Billy: Like I said, Sluman’s a Denny’s guy, Ferguson orders the tall stack of pancakes – there’s 5 of them, you know, so maybe Ferguson was conflicted. I take care of my conflicts at IHOP really simple, just order bacon and sausage with my eggs. Boom – problem solved.

Walt: Such a simple creature – glad that takes care of any issues you’ve got with the accelerated death your little double order is bringing to some poor little pig looking like Wilbur from Charlotte’s Web.

Billy: Hey, if Homer Simpson considers bacon the perfect food, that’s good enough for me. Ah, Homer, they just don’t make ‘em like that anymore.

Walt: Yeah, and that Barney Rubble’s some actor too. Yeah, I saw the article – he also makes a point about not wanting to “designate” new majors – thou doth protest too much PGA when we fail to acknowledge your tournament as an additional major. Look at the Senior Tour – errr, Champions Tour – they tried to designate 5 majors and no nobody takes any of them seriously. I’ll tell you why the Players can’t be a 5th major – look at the way the media covers it.

Tucker: What do you mean? They’ve got the aerial view of pros dunking balls in the water more often the Chinese diving team, not to mention wall-to-wall weekend coverage on NBC. They get 3 extra hours of coverage on Saturday and Sunday. That alone should make it a major – that much prime time coverage.

Rick: Yeah, well, you start defining it that way, and pretty soon the Ryder Cup’s a major. So what, do we start giving all 12 team members on the winning team credit for one major.

Tucker: No way, although Sergio does say it’s like a major to him. Maybe that’s why he gets so cranky when the press bugs him about a major – he thinks he’s already won multiple majors with those Ryder Cup wins.

Walt: OK, back on point – Sergio’s got issues, but mostly with that flat stick he putts with or the hottie in the Michelob commercial that won’t give him her phone number, not the definition of a major. Here’s why it can’t be a 5th major. This is the week after Arnie’s tournament at Bay Hill, with that tremendously ugly 3-putt by Greg Owen and a gutsy performance by Rod Pampling, and it’s the week of the Players Championship, and look at some of the garbage they’re putting on the front of the Yahoo! Sports golf page. First, on Tuesday we get this beauty – “Tiger to play World Match Play.” Not a preview of the Players, not a recap of the Arnie tourney – no, no, we want to read about the fact that Tiger’s committed playing a match play tournament in … September. Whoa, stop the presses – that is major news!

Tucker: What could be bigger news? This is just Tiger’s way of sharing the love with the European tour, trying to share some of his greatness with the good people of Wentworth. Once again, Tiger the giver, just helping out tours all over the world with his mere presence.

Walt: Right, Tiger helping all the tours out there – put down the crack pipe you idiot. Tiger’s going over there for the appearance fee and the $1.75 million check the winner gets. And I hope they’re good with his mere presence – it’s probably all they’ll get given the format. It’s match play – might be like Accenture all over again, Tiger’s gone by the weekend and the TV guys cry in their Cheerios about the unfairness of match play for over 6 hours. 

Tucker: No way, one big difference – the Euros will stick around and watch the guys that beat Tiger. For some reason, they seem to be OK with the whole “whoever beats Tiger must be worth watching” thing. Beats me how they go that way, but whatever – hey, if it weren’t for us, they’d all be speaking German so if they want to get all oppressive against the Americans, then fine. Next thing you know they’ll be rooting against Tiger just to make a point.

Walt: Wow, someone’s a little bitter about Tiger’s poor week at Bay Hill. Fear not, they still found a way to mention his 4-peat during the intros of both weekend telecasts – impressive stuff, considering he was teeing off about the time the leaders were having breakfast. Now, back to the topic at hand, it gets better. Tuesday was classic, but Wednesday was unbelievable. Let’s not give Fred Funk any run for winning last year’s title at 48 in brutal conditions – let’s not talk about the young guns like J.B. Holmes, Villegas, and Bubba – and let’s certainly not talk about the hottest golfer around right now in Geoff Oglivy, or is it David Toms? No, no, let’s forget all that so we can have the headline article on “Tiger misses practice to be with ailing father.” Tiger misses today’s practice round to visit Earl in California for the day. Brilliant – no way this things any kind of major – or they would’ve run something else on the golf home page.

Tucker: Oh, we’ll talk about all those topics right after we give everyone the latest on Tiger. Don’t know what’s so surprising about that – been going on for almost 10 years – your point would be …? Tiger’s been carrying the whole tour – not to mention the LPGA and Champions Tours – for almost a decade. He’s getting tired – give him a break and an off day to go see dad.

Walt: Yeah, you’re probably the only one who thinks Tiger’s carrying anything other than his own wallet and car keys. Tiger’s killing the Champions Tour – well, OK, the Champions Tour tried to kill itself by competing with the PGA events on a pure talent basis – bad idea. But Tiger’s responsible for some of the sponsors bailing. And the LPGA – tell me again how Tiger’s carrying that tour – by borrowing Annika’s skirt from Fred Funk so he can go play in the Dinah Shore?  No, that’s the common misperception – that Tiger somehow raised all boats in the golf world. Clearly the S.S. Woods is riding a growing tide, but the S.S. Minnow also known as the Champions Tour is still on a 3-hour tour to nowhere as they search for the next great personality not named Hale Irwin – and let’s be honest, if the answer is Hale’s personality do we really want the question? And the S.S. LPGA currently has multiple skippers – the leading candidate is Annika, with Paula trying to grab the wheel and Michelle trying to grab anything even remotely close to a made cut on a mens tour event. And don’t get me wrong, I’m fine with the off day, I just think that if the Players wants to be considered a major they really need to work with the media to cover something other than Tiger’s cross-country trip to visit with dad as the headline story.

Rick: Well, you know, there are other places to get your golf news. As of Wednesday night, Golf Digest has articles on the front page about both Greg Owens’ debacle at Bay Hill and predictions on the Players results. GolfWorld predicts a Padraig Harrington win at Sawgrass as its headline story. Now of course Ron Sirak makes a compelling case for the Players being a fifth major, just to counter Ferguson’s effort.

Walt: Absolutely – the golf publications generally get it closer to right. But if the Players is going to pick up any momentum, the Tuesday and Wednesday leads need to be closer to Golf Digest’s articles and less like the current garbage about Tiger’s match play commitment and visit to dad. Besides, if they’re going to get fifth major status, they need one more thing

Tucker: What’s that?

Walt: A more Tiger-friendly course – there’s no way that any track Tiger hasn’t won on early and often will be considered for a major. His only win there was in 2001.

Tucker: Wait a minute – you’re saying that if they picked a different track and Tiger did better in the event it would be more likely to get 5th major status. No way they’ll change the track – TPC is money with a great finishing stretch. Think back to Craig Perks’ eagle-birdie-chip-in-par finish to ice it a few years back.  So what do you think they should do, smart guy?

Walt: That's easy - they should go ahead and pick an event that's got a tough track, some great history, and a world-renowned host,  maybe something like Bay Hill.

Tucker: Bay Hill?  You kidding me - that's never even been mentioned as anything other than the top of the second tier of non-major events, and after the World Golf Championships launched, that's even up for discussion. 

Walt: Yeah, but Bay Hill's got a few things going for it.  First, Arnie's a great host.  Second, some of the finishes have been fantastic - like Phil's back-9 30 with an Arnie-like charge to victory.  Third, Tiger's got a great record with 4 wins, so the media knows that Tiger's going to play well there, unlike the Players, where he's a little spottier.  The added bonus is that this will help get the media that much closer to history.

Tucker: How's that?

Walt: Well, Tiger will go from 10 to 14 majors overnight, and put him that much closer to Jack's 18 majors.  Of course, we'll have to go back and check Jack's record and include his Bay Hill wins in his total to see if the number really is 18 now.

Tucker: Wow, this 5th major stuff is tough to figure out.  It may take a beverage or two - barkeep!

March 22, 2006 in Sports | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Mandatory prime time pairings were just the start for ESPN …

(Another 19th hole discussion by our regular cast of characters)

Walt: Did you check out the article from John Hawkins in Golf World last month? He points out that one of the reasons given for ESPN walking away from PGA Tour coverage during the 2007 contract negotiations was the PGA’s unwillingness to alter tee time policies so that marquee names like Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson would go off at 1 p.m. ET to maximize their TV exposure in the first two rounds. Apparently this was all about economics for the networks – early-round coverage without Tiger wasn’t worth covering, and without rounds of it on both Thursday and Friday, they would rather walk away from the early round coverage entirely.

Tucker: Well, can you blame them? I mean who’s going to tune in on a Thursday or Friday afternoon and watch Lee Janzen and Scott Verplank on the back 9? Without the big names like Tiger and Phil up there, the ratings for weekday telecasts go in the toilet faster than you after you’ve had too much 7-layer dip.

Walt: Very funny – hey, I keep hearing that Corona’s a great laxative – excuse me for field testing some of the theories I hear around this place by people that shall remain nameless.

Rick: You must’ve been hammered – I said Corona’s great for staying relaxed and I’m quite sure I was sober enough not to stutter, so this one’s on you. Staying relaxed is the last thing you want to do after making a dinner out of 7-layer dip and chicken wings – unless you brought a change of clothes.

Walt: OK, OK, back on topic – don’t even start with the Tiger and Phil stuff. Does anyone think this is about anyone other than Tiger? The PGA could put Phil, Ernie, and Vijay out at 1 pm EST every Thursday and Friday and ESPN still wouldn’t have been happy.

Tucker: Fair enough – although if Phil wore those long spikes people might want to watch. Sadly Ernie would play peacemaker – if I were in that threesome with Phil and Vijay I’d be looking for spike marks just to get something started. Vijay whacking Phil with that little 9-wood of his for leaving spike marks on the green with that annoying pre-shot routine, now that’s must-see TV and serious SportsCenter fodder.

Walt: First, I don’t want to hear Phil, Vijay, threesome and whacking in the same sentence again or I’m going to feel like I’ve had too much 7-layer dip and may need to hurl. Now you want to throw Phil’s wife into the threesome, we’ve got something to talk about. Or Tiger’s wife – hey, now there’s an angle we can work with – but I digress. Second, the point that needs to be made is that the PGA did the right thing here, and in fact had Tiger’s back. The PGA policies are in place to give all the players a level playing field for the first two days of a tournament before the cut is made, not to mention level putting greens without spike marks for at least one of the days. To do this, they alternate starting times so that over the first two days most players will have one morning and one afternoon tee times. Morning tee times may not be great for TV coverage, but they are easier to score on since the greens have fewer spike marks and haven’t yet dried out. At most tournaments, the morning scoring average is lower than the afternoon scoring average. If Tiger played in the afternoon on both Thursday and Friday for the most part he would have a higher score after the cut was made and would tee off earlier on Saturday and potentially Sunday unless he had a great early round on Saturday.

Tucker: So that’s perfect – he gets two afternoon rounds on Thursday and Friday and two morning rounds on the weekend, just like everyone else.

Walt: Uh, maybe, but let’s not forget that if his scores higher after Friday he may not make it until the weekend.


Tucker: Like ESPN cares – at the tournaments Tiger’s playing in on ESPN, they don’t have the weekend coverage. They could care less about him making the cut as long as he doesn’t miss either of their telecasts. Plus, all the more drama for them if he’s close to the cut line during Friday’s telecast. It’s all about viewer eyeballs and Tiger chasing the cut is the best way to get folks to watch.

Walt: So we throw out decades of level playing field so that ESPN can get a few more Friday ratings points? All the history around two days of fair treatment for everyone before they make the cut is just ignored? The system used for the greats of golf to this point – Nickluas, Watson, Norman, Faldo, Price – is suddenly no longer valid for use by the PGA during it’s weekly tournaments?

Tucker: I’m sorry, was there a question? Your lips were moving, but no sound was coming out – unless you count that rhetorical question set you just posed. Exactly right, it’s all about audience – history and level playing field come in a very distant second.

Walt: For all we know, this wasn’t even the most obnoxious ask by ESPN, this is just the one Hawkins found most recently. There are a few more creative things they could try to monetize the broadcasts.

Rick: More creative than changing tee time policies – oh, please, do tell.

Walt: How about pay-per-view coverage of Tiger? Whenever Tiger is on course, you see the round in it’s entirety. We’ll put a camera on Tiger the entire time. You should be able to see Tiger’s snack choices – and see him eating them.

Tucker: What about rest room breaks, and the occasional vulgarity?

Walt: No problem, for nature breaks they can just film the port-a-potty while it’s in use. And the occasional vulgarity just adds street cred to the program. People loved the F-bomb on 18 at Pebble Beach at the 2000 Open, and that’s when he’s leading a major by 9 strokes on day 3. I’m thinking they could get $2.99 per day for “Tiger Coverage” – which for the average Tiger fan has to be at least as good as getting “Girls gone wild” on pay-per-view. 

Tucker: I would definitely pay the $2.99 – my only question is how are you going to avoid coverage of Tiger’s playing partners? If I’m paying $2.99 I don’t want to see Rocco Mediate’s pre-shot routine – who does, like a sadistic stretching exercise – or Adam Scott plumb-bobbing a putting read.

Walt: No problem, the classic up-sell helps with this one. For an extra $5 we’ll show you Tiger standing instead of having to watch his playing partners hit. For an additional $5 w’ll show you Tiger even if his playing partner is beating him by 5 strokes.  Finally for an extra $5 we’ll actually break away from Tiger to show you the last 3 holes of his partner’s round, but only if he’s either challenging a course record or on pace for a 59.

Tucker: Interesting – always good to provide the “want fries with that” upsell. Anything else?

Walt: Absolutely, how about the Steve Williams pay-per-view camera – why just watch Tiger when you can watch Steve too? The world’s most famous caddy – hey, let’s be honest, Steve is actually better known than almost anyone else with a PGA card, including Sergio, Ernie, and Retief. Some people used to think that Retief and Steve are the same person, both with that mild-mannered low-key attitude perfect for winning majors on tough courses. Of course Steve fixed all that by starting a camera-throwing event in anticipation of the 2012 Olympics (hey, Tiger will be there for golf – I might as well do something with my off days – what’s that, golf’s not going to be an event? Ah, well, I’ll stop practicing then). We figure the Steve piece is worth $1.99 pay-per-view, with a $5 upsell if you want your camera kicked by Steve during a future PGA Tour event.

Tucker: Interesting, good call on the lower price point – I don’t know how many folks are shelling out $2 for a day pass to hang with Stevie. What else ya got?


Walt: Glad you asked – how about Virtual Tiger? On those increasingly pesky situations where Tiger misses the cut or turns up sick before the weekend, you’ll be able to watch Tiger play the weekend virtually – we’ll create a threesome with one of the TV groups based on Tiger’s past performances. If he’s averaged 5th place at the tournament, we’ll put him in the 3rd-to-last group.

Rick: Now of course that could be tough – what if virtual Tiger catches fire and starts making everything and wins the tournament when he’s actually not even playing?

Walt: Fear not, we’ve got a solve for that too – for an extra $5 you can actually see the live player leaderboard after the event is concluded. Note that this is an optional upsell – you Tiger fans may choose to keep this money and not buy the upsell – that way it’ll be a complete surprise to you when you watch SportsCenter later and someone else wins.

Rick: Can this work at tournaments where Tiger’s not actually playing?

Walt: Sure, he’s probably played it previously, like the Greater Milwaukee Open which he played when he needed tournaments to get his PGA Tour card in 1996. Even if he hasn’t, we can just take shots by previous winners and extrapolate them to Tiger – for example, we can take the best drive on each hole, the best approach, and the best putt, and see how Tiger would do if he played up to his potential. You could really see some scoring records broken virtually with this feature this year – of course we’re hearing from the courses that they won’t honor them as course records – that’s their choice if they want to be that short-sighted!

Rick: So Virtual Tiger can absolutely help create Tiger coverage on weekends. Anything else?

Walt: Yes, glad you asked, and this is my final play for now and one I’m most excited about. This one would be a Virtual Foursome – yes, if you can inject Tiger into the mix as a virtual third member of a twosome, why not throw anyone into the mix? We’re toying with the idea of throwing an eBay listing up where you could bid on the right to become a member of Tiger’s weekend foursome. Worried you won’t be able to hang with Tiger – no problem, with Virtual foursome you can just take a mulligan … or two or three … and hit until you’re happy.

Even better, it won’t be like Tiger has to pay you any attention at all – he’ll have an avatar that heckles you after bad shots and avatar bully – er, bodyguards that take your wallet – er, your avatar’s wallet after you press when you fall 3 down with 2 to play. It’ll be just like playing with Tiger at a pro-am – he won’t talk to you at all and you won’t care because you can tell your buddies you got to play a round with Tiger. Even better, proceeds will go to a local charity of Tiger’s choice, since he knows better than you which charities are really worthy.

Tucker: How will this work?

Walt: This is like the machines you see at resorts where you hit a golf ball into a screen and it measures spin and calculates distance.

Tucker: Aren’t there some issues with the accuracy on those machines – I once hit a 7-iron 231 yards into the wind according to the one I was playing.

Walt: No, not the new ones, you probably misread the wind direction and it was downhill – either that or you have been working out and need to get off the ‘roids.

Tucker: Watch out – ‘roids rage could erupt at any time!

Walt: I’ll be careful. So those are probably some of the things that ESPN wanted to head towards that would help them monetize Tiger events more fully. There’s no question that the Virtual events are in that gray area of acceptable telecast modifications. When you look at this potential list, you start to see where ESPN was going and why it made sense for the PGA tour to go with TV contracts for NBC, CBS, and The Golf Channel. Prime time pairings were just the beginning, but not any more …

February 23, 2006 in Sports | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

ESPN – the once and future king-maker or hoisted on their own petard?

Walt: So ESPN is done with PGA coverage in 2006 – further proof that the E matters way more than the S up there in Bristol.

Tucker: What are you talking about – Finchem and the PGA jacked the price up way too steep so they walked away. They’ll be fine – it’s the PGA that could be in trouble. Going with The Golf Channel as their third major network instead of ABC or ESPN is crazy and a major risk.

Walt: If they had paid more attention to the S, they’d still have the PGA in their portfolio.

Tucker: What’s up with all the letter references – I feel like I’m talking to my 3-year old over a bowl of spaghettios with letters.

Walt: The “Entertainment and Sports Programming Network” – in this case, and in most cases with ESPN the last 10 years the E is running the business. It’s all about entertainment, they could care less about the sports part of it.

Tucker: Sounds like they know their audience – in the age of attention deficit disorder and teens that multi-task between instant messenger, cell phones, text messages, iPods, Tivos, and Gameboys, and that’s just while they’re going to the bathroom – you’ve got to bring entertainment into the equation or they’ll change the channel or worse yet, hit the power off button.

Walt: Well, that explains why the largest cause of damage to cell phones is dropping them into toilets. It doesn’t quite explain why my teenagers manage to lose the Tivo remote about twice a month – if that little box is so important, you’d think they’d take much better care of it, no? Moving on, my point is that by focusing on the entertainment side of the business, the Sportscenter team screwed the golf team.

Tucker: How do you figure?

Walt: Well, ESPN has coverage of early-season and late-season PGA tournaments, as well as early round coverage on Thursday and Friday of some of the larger tournaments. This year ESPN has the Mercedes Championships at Kapalua, the Sony Open, then they take several months of weekend coverage off before returning after all the majors have been played with September-October coverage of the Bell Canadian Open, the 84 Lumber Classic, and the Valero Texas Open. And remember, ABC owns 80% of ESPN, so ABC tournaments like the British Open, the Tour Championship, and the WGC-American Express Championship are all part of the extended ESPN family.

ESPN had a couple ways they could play golf on their flagship program – SportsCenter. As many as 88 million people a month watch SportsCenter – more when malcontents like T.O. or whiners like Barry Bonds say anything, sneeze incorrectly, or pass gas in a crowded room, less when there’s just scores and highlights. So when it came time to cover golf tournaments, SportsCenter decided not to cover events, instead they decided to cover Tiger.

Tucker: You just said that more people watch when there’s controversial stuff attached to it. Surely you can’t expect them to lead with facts and figures when entertainment pays the bills.

Walt: I’m not disagreeing – and don’t call me surely. My point isn’t to second-guess their choice. My point is that the choice they made had a tremendously negative impact on all the golf coverage that their own network, and their parent company through ABC, was putting on the air. By highlighting Tiger’s performances over the leaders in tournaments he wasn’t winning or on the leaderboard, they were telling all of those 88 million viewers that any tournament Tiger wasn’t playing was less important and not worth watching. Over time, any tournament Tiger wasn’t leading was less important, and even more amazing, over time courses where Tiger wasn’t winning got accused of being improperly built because they could not help identify the greatness of Tiger over a 72-hole tournament. So for those of you that have now fallen asleep with your hand on the Tivo pause button, the same tournaments that ESPN was saying “hey, don’t watch this – Tiger’s not leading and/or he’s not playing” were frequently being covered by ESPN and ABC.

It goes deeper than that – there were a lot of little subtleties that cropped up over the course of the years. The “Notables” section of golf coverage where those big names not on the leaderboard could be highlighted went from covering a few notables not in the hunt to being Tiger’s personal playground. Back in the day, the notables side of the page would include a handful of notables and a score – over time ESPN took this to a new level of Tiger-centricity (a real world, though not yet in Wikipedia) with an increasing number of Tiger-related stats and comments. The “Notables” section that would previously read “Norman -3, Woods -3, Duval -3, O’Meara -2, Faldo -1” would now read “Woods -3 4 birdies, 2 bogeys, 4 drives of over 300 yards, 2 ridiculous pin positions that caused lipouts on par putts, and a partridge in a pear tree.” Useful information, but wouldn’t it be great to see what the rest of the notables shot?

But wait, there’s more, wait until I’m finished with this thought and I’ll include a fine set of ginsu cutlery for only $19.95. How about those highlight reels where Tiger shoots 72, your leader shoots a 64, a guy makes an ace, and the highlights shown are Tiger’s tee ball in the left rough on # 1 (only his superior scrambling saved par), Tiger’s missed 25-footer for birdie (he missed putts like this all day), Tiger’s majestic 8-iron from 195 that spins back off the front edge (can you believe that, he flew an 8-iron 195?), Tiger’s putt for par on 18 that goes all around the cup and drops, then a single shot of the leader burying a 12-footer for birdie on # 14 (obviously that’s why he’s leading – he’s got a hot putter), and last but not least coverage of the hole-in-one as if it’s an everyday occurrence (there have been 3 aces through the Nissan Open in 2006 – you’ve got a better chance of shooting something less than 64 than you do of making an ace). This kind of stellar coverage further reminds, or worse yet convinces viewers that there’s no need to watch anyone but Tiger and there’s even less reason to watch a tournament without Tiger in it. 

Tucker: Which is pretty much right – it’s great that he plays so few tournaments – I’ve got so much more available time on weekends to play with the kids and clean up around the house. That’s a win-win situation for all parties from where I sit.

Walt: Not so fast, Hercule Poirot, you master of deduction. Here’s where it’s not a win-win. Most of the tournaments that ESPN (and ABC) cover are those tournaments without Tiger. So everytime they’re busy running “Tiger-reels” cleverly disguised as “highlight reels” they’re just pouring salt in an open wound and turning the knife on their ESPN colleagues. Not only is that downright mean, it doesn’t make any business sense at all. Why would you let one business unit run over another one so obviously and do nothing about it? From where I sit, the ESPN Golf team was hoisted on their own petard.

Tucker: Whoa – petard, isn’t that that funny looking mustard? Whatever it is, hoisting someone on it doesn’t sound like a great idea – could be painful – I think I pulled a groin just thinking about it. And nice Agatha Christie reference with that Poirot quip – and your wife says you’re as funny as a closed refrigerator, she’s wrong, you’ve got it all over that fridge. I will say you’ve obviously been watching too much Masterpiece Theater – you need to get out more. And stop with the open wound and knife comments – I get queasy at the mere sight of blood, so we can just put an end to that whole discussion. Now as for the question about business units getting along, well welcome to corporate America, where that stuff happens 24/7/365.

Besides, I don’t think the groups aren’t getting along. I just think they’ve got different organizational goals between the SportsCenter and Golf teams that they can’t quite get aligned. The SportsCenter team is all about king making – they want to anoint the next king so they can tear him or her down and then find the next king. The Golf team wants to actually cover the individual golf events – the leaders, relevant storylines, and emerging players. So Golf wants to tell the story of the event for the week – SportsCenter just wants to find a personality folks can latch on to so that 88 million viewership increases.

Walt: Right – I’m with you there, mon ami. The goals may not actually match up that well. So here’s the question – why do they go through the whole king-making, tear-down, make-the-next-king sequence?

Tucker: Were you born yesterday? That’s how the 88 million viewership was created – you’ve gotta give people a reason to watch beyond just scores. By making T.O. bigger than the NFL, they can cover him 24/7 and people will watch – even if he’s just pumping iron in his driveway or making a complete idiot of himself at a press conference with absolutely no substance. By making Barry Bonds bigger than major league baseball, they can generate enough interest to have a designated “Barry Reporter” and then go one step deeper and create a new reality TV show opportunity. This is all about “share of eyeball” – how much of each viewer’s TV viewing for the day can they get to their network of channels? It’s like share of stomach for the soda guys, but a lot less messy and with no clean-up required if your stomach share starts to create issues.

That’s the great thing about king-making, there’s always another king you can make – if one guys gets boring or has nothing going on that’s entertaining, they can go on to the next guy, or gal. Danica Patrick’s hot because she’s got a top-5 finish at Indy, she’s in, with apologies to old what’s his name that actually win. She cools off, we’ll go with Big Ben and Jerome Bettis, even though Willie Parker and Hines Ward had at least as much to do with the Super Bowl run. David Toms wins the Sony with straight drives and precision irons – boring, let’s talk about Bubba Watson’s 350-yard drives. Then let’s ignore Bubba when J.B. Holmes unleashes mammoth drives and a 7-shot win at the FBR. If they don’t keep making different kings, people will stop watching.

Walt: Right, so their main vehicle for viewership is king making, and constantly replacing old kings with new queens and even newer kings. Sounds like a vicious game of Texas Hold ‘em – kings, queens, and I’m sure there are some one-eyed jacks somewhere down the river for me to go all in on, but I digress. Now here’s the hoisted on their own petard part for those of you that are mildly slow or downright remedial – the exact same tool has been so badly abused in golf and had they used it properly they could have created a situation where every tournament has a story to tell and all kinds of kings and queens emerge with frightening regularity.

Stay with me now – from 1996 and the “Hello world” press conference through today, the press – and particularly ESPN – has given Tiger king status for the entire time and never bothered to take it away or give it to anyone else. Tiger became the best player, most entertaining player, best driver of the ball, best iron player, best wedge player, best bunker player, best putter, best course management practitioner, and most mentally focused player on tour. He was king of all kings – even through those, ahem, relatively dark patches like 1997-99 and 2002-2004. Duval could’ve been king of something with wins in 13 of 39 tournaments in 97-99, including a Players Championship. Roadkill on the way to anointing the once and future king – and besides Duval only did all that because he knows Tiger. O’Meara wins 2 majors in a row and all he can get known for is being “Tiger’s mentor on tour.” Four first-time winners in the majors in 2003, including Furyk and Weir – no problem, roadkill as we compare it to the fluke year of 1969. Tiger retains his status. Vijay goes for 9 wins and almost $11 million in earnings in 2004 – no problem, he was just keeping the # 1 ranking warm for Tiger. So instead of making many kings, ESPN chose to make one and ignore the rest, and that’s why people stopped watching tournaments Tiger didn’t play and even started turning off tournaments he was in if he wasn’t in contention. So the over-hyped synergy that groups in an organization can create by working together were completely ignored, bypassed, and thoroughly tossed out with the trash at ESPN and because of that it made no sense for the golf team to try and cover PGA events.

Tucker: Don’t worry, ESPN’s got the next part of the strategy all dialed in.

Walt: How’s that?

Tucker: They’re already making the next king, and you saw the early results at the Sony. Michelle Wie will be the future king/queen of golf – she’s 16, she hits it nine miles, and she’ll be winning on the LPGA, PGA, and possibly other tours in the next 5 years.

Walt: How do you figure all that – she’s won nothing yet, and she has a long way to go to catch the LPGA teen stars Paula Creamer and Morgan Pressel, not to mention the reigning queen Annika Sorenstam – then maybe she can go chase the PGA guys.  She may be great later - for now she's all potential.  And what if you’re wrong – what if she doesn’t start winning everywhere?

Tucker: She’s only 16 – she’ll get it dialed in. And if I’m wrong, no problem – ESPN will just start with the “Michelle Wie – too much too fast” and “Michelle – what went wrong” pieces on Outside the Lines and other shows, including SportsCenter. She’ll be the queen whether she wants it or not. And if that doesn’t work, we’ll start with Cheyenne Woods – she’s Tiger’s niece so we can get more coverage of Tiger in everytime she wins. There’s your synergy for the once and future king maker – you can keep that petard of yours, but make sure not to hurt anybody with it.

February 19, 2006 in Sports | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Tim Finchem – from Russian Roulette to master of his own domain in one contract!

(For an overview of our cast of characters, click here)

Rick: Nice approach on 18 Tucker – you punk. If you’d hit it like that all day you would’ve pounded us.

Tucker: Yeah, and if my aunt had a Johnson, she’d be my uncle. Sure I couldn’t find it for about 15 or 17 holes, but when I had to have one, I found it. Did I mention the beer always tastes better when you’re buying – I’m good for a Corona with a lime. You don’t need a lime in yours – you’re sour enough already.

Rick: Ha – oh, that’s funny – you’re killing me – you may end up with some secret sauce in yours if you’re not careful.

Walt: I’m good for Corona as well – hey, any of you boys check out the details on the new PGA Tour TV deal for 2007?

Tucker: What for – you’ll give us all the highlights, I count on you for my PGA Tour headlines. It’s just so much easier to get the relevant news second-hand than to actually go out and read it myself. Reading it and processing it is so much more work than just having it spoon-fed to me.

Walt: Apparently most of the media agrees with you – and thinks that many of us would rather have our sports news spoon fed to us, particularly when their conclusions don’t quite jibe with the facts.

Billy: Jive – did you just say jive? You gotta got off those “What’s happening?” reruns on Nickelodeon – they are putting your vocabulary in the remedial section. Now “what you talking about Willis” – there’s some classic TV.

Walt: Yeah, good call, from the show that either put you six feet under or in drug rehab – think we’ll pass on the Different Strokes Tivo season pass. Now back to our topic – the new TV contract. ABC, ESPN and USA are out – NBC and CBS now split virtually all the big-time tourneys and the Golf Channel has a 15-year deal to do the fall events and the early rounds for some of the rest. Gary Van Sickle at SI.com makes some interesting points, including that there’s a dark side of Tiger’s success in the past decade – lot less people watching events he’s not playing. For example, Tucker is still blissfully unaware that they even have a PGA tournament on Super Bowl weekend.

Tucker: There is? Well hey, I can be forgiven – with my Patriots winning 3 of the last 4 Super Bowls I’ve been kind of busy on Super Bowl Sunday. Where do they play – over there in Dubai or somewhere?

Walt: Uh, yes, but that’s not the PGA tour.

Rick: Yo, chowder-head, that’s 3 of 5. My Steelers took care of the Sea Chickens this year while your Pats watched on TV like the rest of us. So back to the topic, if Dubai’s not a PGA event why is at always the lead on SportsCenter?

Walt: Maybe because Tiger’s playing over there. I don’t seem to remember it being found on SportsCenter when Tiger wasn’t in it.  Dubai, of course, is one of those scourge tournaments that pay, ahem, appearance fees.

Billy: It’s a lot like the Deutsche Bank – Tiger visits Germany while the boys are playing Colonial to honor Hogan and what’s the lead story? Tiger trails by 2 with a 68 – Clarke and Westwood tied for the lead in about font size 4 as a sub-head. You gotta be kidding me – and everyone knows the reason he’s not playing Colonial is because it’s a Bank of America tourney and he’s a Deutsche Bank guy. Tiger talks all the time about the history of the game and his respect for the legends like Arnie and Jack – hey, El Tigre, how about a little love for the wee ice man Mr. Hogan – oh, I’m sorry, that doesn’t quite line up with your sponsor list, well isn’t that unfortunate?

 Tucker: Yo Steelhead – enough Super Bowl chatter already. That game was so boring I dozed off during the second quarter – thankfully woke up in time to see that great “magic fridge” commercial – classic. How much did it cost you boys to put those refs in your pocket? Man, that push-off on Jackson in the first quarter, and that phantom holding call, along with the Charles White sequel best known as “really, Ben scored on that play?” made it tough for you guys to lose.

Walt: Enough football – let’s try and stay on topic. Like I was saying, there’s a little tournament in Phoenix Super Bowl weekend – the FBR Open.

Tucker: I’m sure like 17 people watched it in between offensive series – and believe me in that first quarter most of them were offensive, it stunk worse than those cattle feedlots on the 5 freeway on our drives down to SoCal. And why should they watch – Tiger’s not there and nothing exciting ever happens at tournaments he’s not playing.

Walt: Wrong again, young grasshopper, they had over 500,000 fans in person and a fair number on TV because they’re smart enough to finish before the Super Bowl starts. You would hope that entertaining golf could beat some of the 10-plus hour pre-game show, and this one was real entertaining. Three bombers were in the last group – J.J. Henry and Ryan Palmer can move it out there a bit, but the star that emerged from Phoenix was the 23 year old from Kentucky, J.B. Holmes. Two months ago he won Q school and in his 4th start he locks up his first PGA Tour win with some clutch putts, some absolutely huge drives including a 354-yarder on the final hole, and a 263-yard, ahem, 4-iron to 14 feet on 15 – and of course he made the putt for eagle and a 6-shot lead. He won by 7 – you could call this a significant coming out party for J.B.,which the CBS crew did.

Rick: Wow – 354 – sounds like my kind of guy. I didn’t see it – I actually watch the entire pre-game when the Steelers are in the big game. You’d be amazed how many things I did not know about the Steelers – thankfully that got fixed with 8 hours of game-day education. What a great investment of time on my part – OK, the web helped a little bit. So that sounds kind of entertaining – hey, anytime a guy is hitting it 263 with a 4-iron – and that’s over water, I believe – that is getting it done, even more so when it’s under final round pressure. So why weren’t people watching?

Walt: Presumably because Tiger’s in Dubai, so watching a different tournament strikes some people as a waste of time.

Tucker: Wait a minute – I remember this tourney. Tiger did play it once or twice early in his career – he made an ace there on 16, right? How exciting was that – Tiger buries it with about 50,000 people watching in that stadium seating around 16 then plays raise the rough as he approaches the green. That place was off the hook – I’ve seen arena football games with less noise.

Walt: Yeah, there’s the comparison you want – against the noise level at an AFL game – woohoo, way to set your sights high. Let’s not forget, Tiger was trailing Steve Jones by double digits at the time – Jones went on to win by 11. That was a nice little shot by Tiger, and of course ESPN runs that highlight as if it helped Tiger win the tourney and take the PGA to a whole new level of fan awareness and insanity. In reality, it probably drove Tiger out of town – less than two years later Tiger was complaining about the Phoenix crowd being too rowdy. Imagine that – Tiger complaining about the same crowd he fired up getting out of hand a few years later. Maybe tournaments without Tiger aren’t boring – maybe they’re just tournaments without Tiger but with a lot of other great players hitting some tremendous shots under pressure, like J.B.’s 263-yard 4-iron on 15. That was clutch – whether you watched it or not.

Tucker: Yeah, but J.B. can hit all the nuked 4-irons and drivers he wants – if Tiger’s not playing, he’s not going to get any kind of TV audience and he’ll be on the 48th minute of SportsCenter, right after highlights of Michelle Wie missing yet another cut in an obscure Nike event in a city you’ve never heard of unless you or your relatives live there. That’s Tim Finchem’s problem – all these youngsters, bombers, and AARP wannabes like Fred Funk win tournaments Tiger’s not playing in and expect people to watch.

Walt: Not so fast – Funk actually won the Players Championship with Tiger in the field last year.

Tucker: Which makes my point – you want people to watch, win with Tiger in the field. Want nobody to watch – win when he’s not playing.

Walt: Hold on there Sparky – Tiger only plays about 21 tournaments a year – and one of those is the British Open, so that makes 20 on this side of the pond. There are 48 tournaments on the 2006 schedule. So there are 28 tournaments that Tiger’s never going to get beaten in – for those of you that are math-challenged, that’s 58% of the tournaments!

Rick: That’s unbelievable that Finchem let’s those kind of #s happen – what kind of commissioner is that guy? He should be setting it up so Tiger plays every tournament – look at Nascar, they’ve got it set up so that there’s incentives and almost all the Nascar boys show up every week. Now, admittedly, that could just be because many of them are southern rednecks who never get tired of checking out the trackside talent, which is apparently easier to get to know when you’ve actually raced a vehicle instead of just standing around. If Nascar can do it, why can’t the PGA?

Walt: First of all they might not be rednecks, they could just be horny. There’s quite a bit of talent at the tracks, if you know what I mean. Second of all, Nascar built a brand around the events – the PGA has been all about personality marketing, closer to the David Stern model, which is great when Larry and Magic are going at it in the finals almost annually, then hand it off to Michael who plays in the finals 6 out of 8 years, skipping only two years for that little fling with baseball. Nowadays, with the Spurs and Pistons looking like mini-dynasties, it’s really tough to try and shove Kobe and KG and the other score-a-bunch, don’t-ask-my-shooting-% idiots down the public’s throat when they’re missing the playoffs or bowing out early.

Billy: So you’re saying the PGA chose the wrong model – they marketed personalities when they should’ve been marketing events? I can understand that – sort of, I still need more to drink to really comprehend it – waiter, scotch and soda, rocks, stat!

Walt: You’re pretty much on top of it Billy – nice work. But it’s not the PGA’s fault – they were trying to market the whole tour with all the “these guys are good” commercials – you know the ones, like Lefty hitting that wedge to David Robinson – see, the Spurs can do cool commercials! – for a dunk at the buzzer.

Billy: Thanks waiter – glug glug glug – ahhhhhhhh, lunch of champions. So wait a minute, that sounds like personality marketing to the dummy sitting in my chair – they’re building campaigns around the players. Shouldn’t they build them around some of the great courses like Riviera or Pebble Beach or Bay Hill? The courses always show up and never get injured – geez, I’m a sales guy but even I know that much about marketing.

Walt: Well, Billy, you’re smarter than the boys at PGA headquarters – they went with the player campaign. Another great alternate would have been to go with a campaign around the great finishes – Allenby’s 3-wood in a 6-man playoff at Riviera, Shaun Micheel’s 7-iron to ice the PGA Championship, and so on. If you sell the locations or the old finishes, you don’t have to worry about who shows up.

Billy: Now of course if you sell that stuff you’re only going to get the hard-core golf fans like us – wooh, hey, excuse me, sorry about that, let’s not light any matches on this side of the room for a while, OK?

Tucker: What’s that – oh, man, that’s putrid – whatever you ate, don’t ever eat it again. I think something died inside you and has been waiting to get out. I’ll … just … respond from over here where it’s relatively safe. Gotta agree with Billy – those types of campaigns aren’t the answer – they just get the guys who watch golf anyway. I thought the last couple of TV deals were huge. And if this Tiger-skewed ratings stuff isn’t the PGA’s fault, then whose is it?

Walt: You’re right – those campaigns are going to get the hard-core golf guys watching, and the last two TV deals were huge. That’s part of the problem, and why the growth rates on this recent contract are so much smaller. The media early on decided that the PGA was wrong – “these guys” may be good, but Tiger’s better for ratings. So they basically ignored a bunch of great performances from guys like David Duval, Mark O’Meara, Retief Goosen, and Ernie Els to pump up the Tiger hype machine. This got casual golf fans to watch and drove the TV rates through the roof – the ’97 deal was negotiated after Tiger’s break-out win at Augusta – the next contract after Tiger’s slam. Fortunate timing for Tim, but meanwhile the networks were losing a ton of money because the rest of the tournaments had low ratings that more than offset the ratings when Tiger played and was in contention. The PGA didn’t want Tiger to skew the ratings – but the media made sure he did. Third time around the networks were getting smart – they knew they’d been losing big and didn’t feel like getting pounded by Finchem again. Meanwhile Finchem knew that he was tired of playing roulette – imagine having to sell a TV deal on a year where Tiger’s 0-for-4 at slams, or actually misses a cut at one.

Rick: Misses a cut – yeah, like that’s gonna happen. His streak is at like 140-something.

Walt: Not so fast there Rick – you’ve been drinking more than Billy, thankfully without the after-effects. Tiger’s consecutive cuts streak ended at 142 at the Byron Nelson last year, and just for good measure he missed at Disney as well, said something about wanting to show Elin his monorail, not sure what that’s all about. Remember, a couple times he’s been dangerously close to the cut line, including that one tremendous up-and-down on the 9th at Augusta to make the cut on the number – how tight do you figure the sphincters were on the CBS brass as he lined up that putt?

Billy: About as tight as mine before I let out that air biscuit?

Walt: I’ll say this – you’re not a funny drunk, just a smelly one. So long story short, Finchem got sick of betting on Tiger’s performances so he could stick it to the networks. So he took the long-term deal, shrunk networks covering it to spread the big tournaments out better – we all know things split better 2 ways than 3. In short, Tim went from Russian roulette to master of his domain in a hurry. Now he’s able to invest with NBC, CBS, and the Golf Channel in some of the campaigns I was talking about and try to make the events bigger than the personalities, which is the best way to play it. More like Nascar, less like the NBA and the PGA of the last 10 years.

Billy: I still think he’s better off making Tiger into Magic and Phil into Larry – worked for David Stern.

Walt: Works in basketball because only two teams make the finals – golf tournaments are so deep these days that anyone can win them – see Ben Curtis, Shaun Micheel, and Michael Campbell for recent entrants into the “one-hit wonder” club. Tim and the networks are making the right call – might be the only call they could make, but they made it.

Billy: Yeah, well if you'll excuse me I'm going to go check out some websites of Tiger's wife and master my own domain. 

Walt: Wherever the over-sharing line is, you just crossed it.  Taxi - take this man home!

February 16, 2006 in Sports | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Next »

Archives

  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005

About

Add me to your TypePad People list
Subscribe to this blog's feed